{"id":67215,"date":"2024-03-29T21:57:11","date_gmt":"2024-03-29T20:57:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/?p=67215"},"modified":"2024-03-29T21:57:11","modified_gmt":"2024-03-29T20:57:11","slug":"the-lesson-with-steve-saka-about-lanceros","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/the-lesson-with-steve-saka-about-lanceros\/","title":{"rendered":"The lesson with Steve Saka about Lanceros"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We had an informative chat with Steve Saka, Dunbarton Tobacco &amp; Trust, at the trade fair stand. As a blender, he has long since achieved legendary status &#8211; and his cigars speak for themselves.<\/p>\n<p>There is an interesting Lancero sampler on the table in front of him and I admit to being a Lancero fan.<\/p>\n<p>&#8222;I hate Lanceros and that&#8217;s exactly why I launched this sampler,&#8220; laughs Saka. &#8222;This is the last time in Las Vegas for now, I&#8217;m going to miss it a bit &#8211; today is day two and it&#8217;s been a great show for us so far&#8220;, Saka continues.<\/p>\n<p>Saka explains to me that there is a risk with lanceros &#8211; due to their length and thinness, the buncher does not press the roll properly when turning it in the mold &#8211; simply because it is a very uncomfortable movement for the hands. He shows me how &#8211; and is very right.<br \/>\nIn addition, there would be little freedom for blending creativity &#8211; again due to the thinness.<br \/>\nWhat is the name of the sampler? &#8211; GFY Lancero Collection!<\/p>\n<p>What else? Sin Compromiso No. 4 (5 x 54) was launched off during the 2024 PCA, which is the 9th vitola of the Sin Compromiso family.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We had an informative chat with Steve Saka at the trade fair stand. As a blender, he has long since achieved legendary status &#8211; and his cigars speak for themselves.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":67217,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[49,55,2812,44],"tags":[4393,6724,4394],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67215"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67215"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67215\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":67219,"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67215\/revisions\/67219"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/67217"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}