{"id":12045,"date":"2016-07-21T12:35:20","date_gmt":"2016-07-21T10:35:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/?p=12045"},"modified":"2016-08-11T11:19:56","modified_gmt":"2016-08-11T09:19:56","slug":"pio-cigars-to-re-release-classic-blend-as-1996-series","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/pio-cigars-to-re-release-classic-blend-as-1996-series\/","title":{"rendered":"PIO Cigars to Re-Release Classic Blend as 1996 Series"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>PIO Cigars is set to release a new line called 1996 Series in the sizes Robusto (6 x 50), Churchill (7 x 48), Toro (6 x 52), Torpedo (6 x 52) and Toro Extra (6 x 54). The company stated in a press release that the 1996 Series is being released as part of their 20th Anniversary celebration and resembles the PIO Classic, a line &#8222;which until today and since its creation in 1996, was only being sold at very few, select cigar shops.&#8220;<\/p>\n<p>The line features the &#8222;same blend, aroma, and taste of the last 20 years but rightfully decorated with the commemorative band and the label name &#8222;PIO 1996 Series&#8220; previously released for our 10 year anniversary in 2006.&#8220;<\/p>\n<p>Rolled in Nicaragua, the blend is comprised of Ecuadorian Maduro binder and wrapper and filler tobaccos from Nicaragua, Mexico and the Dom. Rep.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PIO Cigars is set to release a new line called 1996 Series in the sizes Robusto (6 x 50), Churchill (7 x 48), Toro (6 x 52), Torpedo (6 x 52) and Toro Extra (6 x 54).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":12046,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[49,55,2796],"tags":[1842,2375,2726,2727,1839],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12045"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12045"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12045\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12046"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12045"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12045"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cigarjournal.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12045"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}